On October 6, Kazakhstan will hold a referendum on the construction of its first nuclear power plant, a decision that could shape the country's energy future for decades. President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has framed this as part of a «dialogue with the people,» but critics argue the vote lacks crucial details.
The referendum will ask a single question: «Do you agree with the construction of a nuclear power plant in Kazakhstan?» With over 12 million eligible voters, the government needs a 50% turnout for the result to be valid. Recent polls suggest 53% support the idea, while 32.5% oppose it, citing safety and environmental concerns.
Kazakhstan's nuclear history is complex. The country hosted a Soviet-era nuclear plant in Aktau, which was decommissioned in the 1990s. Since then, proposals for a new plant have surfaced repeatedly, gaining momentum in 2019 with Russia's offer to build one near Lake Balkhash.
President Tokayev has increasingly emphasized the need for nuclear power, citing potential energy deficits and economic concerns. However, the Ukraine conflict has complicated matters, particularly regarding Russia's involvement.
The government has conducted public hearings nationwide, though critics claim these events often excluded opponents. A key point of contention is the lack of information about the potential contractor. Four companies are in the running: China's CNNC, South Korea's KHNP, Russia's Rosatom, and France's EDF.
Former Kazatomprom chief Mukhtar Dzhakishev has highlighted potential issues with the Russian bid, including sanctions risks and technological vulnerabilities. Some speculate the referendum could be a way for the government to back out of a politically sensitive project.
The South Korean and Chinese proposals have their own merits, with the latter offering the cheapest and fastest construction timeline.
Critics argue that by not disclosing the potential contractor, the government is asking citizens to vote on an abstract concept rather than a concrete plan. This approach allows officials to deflect responsibility for any future problems, simply stating, «This is what you decided."
As Kazakhstan grapples with its energy future, the nuclear referendum raises more questions than it answers, leaving citizens to make a crucial decision with incomplete information.
-
18 November18.11Land of Turks is Not for TurksDid Turkey Have Chances to Gain Power Over Central Asia -
15 November15.11Turkic UnityWhy Erdogan Insists on Accelerating Transition of Central Asian Countries to Latin Alphabet -
06 August06.08What went wrong in Central Asia’s coronavirus response?How poor planning and a fixation on faulty test results undid months of hard work -
10 July10.07An ''unknown pneumonia''?New statistics give a glimpse of the true extent of Kazakhstan's COVID-19 crisis -
02 July02.07Just like in Italy?Kazakhstan becomes the first Central Asian nation to struggle with a second wave of COVID-19 -
25 June25.06ВидеоAn Uzbek firstTashkent sends troops to Russia’s Victory Day Parade for the first time. There they took part alongside their neighbours
-
Recent reports from Almaty shed a little light on a rather unclear issue
-
How Central Asia fought the coronavirus with quarantines – and appears to be winning
-
Why Ukraine and Kazakhstan relate so differently to the millions of famine deaths they suffered during the Soviet era
-
Helicopter video captures water gushing from the Sardoba reservoir, with vast damage reported in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan